Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors With Dexamethasone in Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia: Contributions to Long-Term Polypharmacy

Introduction  Proton pump inhibitors have been used in conjunction with dexamethasone to treat patients with COVID-19. This is given prophylactically to anticipate possible complications while on steroids, including abdominal pain, gastric ulcers, or gastrointestinal bleeding. Proton pump inhibitors have complications, including Clostridium difficile infection, pneumonia, osteoporosis, and vitamin deficiency. The goal of the following project is to assess if there are any subjective and objective benefits to be treated with this regimen instead of dexamethasone on its own. Another inquiry that will be investigated is if this combination results in more patients being prescribed a proton pump inhibitor on discharge.  Materials and methods The following is a retrospective study involving two groups, the first group taking the aforementioned regimen and the second group on dexamethasone only. Objective findings that will be compared include the change in hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine levels from admission to discharge between the two groups. Subjective findings include complaints of abdominal pain and reported bloody bowel movements. Medication reconciliation on discharge will also be assessed to observe if patients were discharged with a proton pump inhibitor and how long were they taking this medication as an outpatient.  Results The difference between hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine between the two groups was not significant as the p-values were .14, .43. and .10, respectively. Therefore, the null hypothesis was accepted that there was no difference in these objective findings between the two populations. In addition, neither set had complaints of abdominal pain. For the investigated population on a proton pump inhibitor, it was found that 53% of these patients were discharged with this medication. This subset was on this medication for an average of three months, with the maximum duration being seven months for one patient. The data supported the hypothesis that there was no subjective or objective benefit to being on this drug combination, and consequentially, most patients continue to take this medication for months after discharge.  Conclusion The data affirms the hypothesis that most patients can tolerate dexamethasone without the need for a proton pump inhibitor. This study was limited to patients without any history of gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, or gastrointestinal bleeding;a separate study would need to be done to investigate the need for prophylaxis for patients with these comorbidities. The concerning finding was that patients are being discharged with a medication that they do not need, some patients are taking proton pump inhibitors for more than half the year. There should be further screening to determine if a patient needs to be on a proton pump inhibitor other than steroids. 

Disparities in Healthcare: Evaluation of Equity in Access to Surveillance Colonoscopy After Hemicolectomy in Patients With Colon Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Surveillance colonoscopy is rcommended for patients with colon cancer who obtain a hemicolectomy for tumor resection. Guidelines from many organizations require this colonoscopy to be performed within one year after resection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in surveillance colonoscopy rates between white people and African Americans who had their colon tumors resected. The second objective was to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic affected these colonoscopy rates. The study goal was to shed light on the issue of low colonoscopy rates among African Americans with colon cancer after tumor removal by hemicolectomy and on how the pandemic exacerbated this issue. METHODS: A total of 800 patient charts from Brooklyn Methodist Hospital were reviewed. The selected patients had a history of colon cancer and received hemicolectomy in the past. The patients were divided according to race and their expected surveillance colonoscopy dates. One group included patients with an expected one-year follow-up date for colonoscopy after hemicolectomy before the start of the pandemic. Another group included patients with colonoscopies due to be performed during the pandemic. A two-sample proportions test was used to compare the colonoscopy rates before and during the pandemic for African Americans. The two-sample equal variance t-test was used to compare the average distance from the patients' home to hospital between African Americans and whites. RESULTS: The surveillance colonoscopy rates among African Americans were 54% before and 45% during the pandemic. This difference was significant (p < 0.001). The colonoscopy rates between whites and African Americans differed. The surveillance colonoscopy rates among whites were 97% before and 84% during the pandemic. The distance between the patients' homes and the hospital where the procedure was performed also significantly differed. The average travel distance for whites was 1.33 miles and that for African Americans was 3.98 miles (p < 0.001). A total of 215 of the 416 African American patients included had tumors in the cecum and ascending colon. CONCLUSION: A significant difference was observed in the colonoscopy rates for African Americans before and during the pandemic. A substantial difference was found in the colonoscopy rates between whites and African Americans, which increased during the pandemic. The distance from the patients' home to the hospital performing the colonoscopy was twice as far for African Americans than whites in the borough of Brooklyn. These data support the hypothesis that a significant difference in colonoscopy rates exists between African Americans and whites, probably because of a healthcare disparity in access to this procedure. The study objective was to highlight the long-standing issue of low colonoscopy rates in African Americans and how the pandemic further decreased these low rates.

Using Clinical and Echocardiographic Characteristics to Characterize the Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has been associated with an increased incidence of ischemic stroke. The use echocardiography to characterize the risk of ischemic stroke in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 has not been explored. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 368 patients hospitalized between 3/1/2020 and 5/31/2020 who had laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 and underwent transthoracic echocardiography during hospitalization. Patients were categorized according to the presence of ischemic stroke on cerebrovascular imaging following echocardiography. Ischemic stroke was identified in 49 patients (13.3%). We characterized the risk of ischemic stroke using a novel composite risk score of clinical and echocardiographic variables: age <55, systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg, anticoagulation prior to admission, left atrial dilation and left ventricular thrombus. RESULTS: Patients with ischemic stroke had no difference in biomarkers of inflammation and hypercoagulability compared to those without ischemic stroke. Patients with ischemic stroke had significantly more left atrial dilation and left ventricular thrombus (48.3% vs 27.9%, p = 0.04; 4.2% vs 0.7%, p = 0.03). The unadjusted odds ratio of the composite novel COVID-19 Ischemic Stroke Risk Score for the likelihood of ischemic stroke was 4.1 (95% confidence interval 1.4-16.1). The AUC for the risk score was 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 Ischemic Stroke Risk Score utilizes clinical and echocardiographic parameters to robustly estimate the risk of ischemic stroke in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and supports the use of echocardiography to characterize the risk of ischemic stroke in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Using Clinical and Echocardiographic Characteristics to Characterize the Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Patients with COVID-19

Background COVID-19 has been associated with an increased incidence of ischemic stroke. The use echocardiography to characterize the risk of ischemic stroke in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 has not been explored. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 368 patients hospitalized between 3/1/2020 and 5/31/2020 who had laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 and underwent transthoracic echocardiography during hospitalization. Patients were categorized according to the presence of ischemic stroke on cerebrovascular imaging following echocardiography. Ischemic stroke was identified in 49 patients (13.3%). We characterized the risk of ischemic stroke using a novel composite risk score of clinical and echocardiographic variables: age <55, systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg, anticoagulation prior to admission, left atrial dilation and left ventricular thrombus. Results Patients with ischemic stroke had no difference in biomarkers of inflammation and hypercoagulability compared to those without ischemic stroke. Patients with ischemic stroke had significantly more left atrial dilation and left ventricular thrombus (48.3% vs 27.9%, p = 0.04;4.2% vs 0.7%, p = 0.03). The unadjusted odds ratio of the composite novel COVID-19 Ischemic Stroke Risk Score for the likelihood of ischemic stroke was 4.1 (95% confidence interval 1.4-16.1). The AUC for the risk score was 0.70. Conclusions The COVID-19 Ischemic Stroke Risk Score utilizes clinical and echocardiographic parameters to robustly estimate the risk of ischemic stroke in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and supports the use of echocardiography to characterize the risk of ischemic stroke in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Characterization of Myocardial Injury in Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial injury is frequent among patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and is associated with a poor prognosis. However, the mechanisms of myocardial injury remain unclear and prior studies have not reported cardiovascular imaging data. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize the echocardiographic abnormalities associated with myocardial injury and their prognostic impact in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted an international, multicenter cohort study including 7 hospitals in New York City and Milan of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who had undergone transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) and electrocardiographic evaluation during their index hospitalization. Myocardial injury was defined as any elevation in cardiac troponin at the time of clinical presentation or during the hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 305 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years and 205 patients (67.2%) were male. Overall, myocardial injury was observed in 190 patients (62.3%). Compared with patients without myocardial injury, those with myocardial injury had more electrocardiographic abnormalities, higher inflammatory biomarkers and an increased prevalence of major echocardiographic abnormalities that included left ventricular wall motion abnormalities, global left ventricular dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction grade II or III, right ventricular dysfunction and pericardial effusions. Rates of in-hospital mortality were 5.2%, 18.6%, and 31.7% in patients without myocardial injury, with myocardial injury without TTE abnormalities, and with myocardial injury and TTE abnormalities. Following multivariable adjustment, myocardial injury with TTE abnormalities was associated with higher risk of death but not myocardial injury without TTE abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with COVID-19 who underwent TTE, cardiac structural abnormalities were present in nearly two-thirds of patients with myocardial injury. Myocardial injury was associated with increased in-hospital mortality particularly if echocardiographic abnormalities were present.